D221 Final Paper: Practice Improvement Plan for Pressure Injury Prevention

D221 Final Paper: Practice Improvement Plan for Pressure Injury Prevention

D221 Final Paper: Practice Improvement Plan for Pressure Injury Prevention

Name

Western Governors University

D221 Organizational Systems and Healthcare Transformation

Prof. Name

Date

Situation (S)

What is the healthcare-related situation?

Implementing a structured, evidence-based turning protocol for immobile hospitalized patients is essential in nursing care to ensure patient safety. Without proper repositioning and monitoring, patients are at heightened risk of developing pressure injuries. These injuries can cause severe pain, infections, and longer hospital stays. Such complications delay recovery, complicate discharge plans, and increase the likelihood of hospital readmissions. Consequently, failure to manage pressure injuries negatively impacts patient outcomes, burdens healthcare resources, and disrupts hospital operational efficiency.

Background (B)

A2a: Data

What data exists regarding pressure injuries in healthcare?

Hospital-acquired pressure injuries (HAPIs) serve as a key quality indicator for patient safety and nursing care standards within U.S. healthcare systems (Tervo-Heikkinen et al., 2023). Annually, over 2.5 million Americans suffer from pressure ulcers, which result in pain, infection risk, and added healthcare costs. To combat this, the Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality (AHRQ) released the Pressure Injury Prevention Toolkit in 2012, designed to support healthcare providers in prevention strategies. This toolkit stresses the importance of a multidisciplinary approach, routine skin assessments, adherence to repositioning schedules, and staff education to mitigate risks and promote patient safety and healing.

A2b: Patient Safety Standards

Which patient safety standards apply to pressure injury prevention?

The Joint Commission’s National Patient Safety Goal (NPSG.14.01.01) highlights pressure injury prevention as a critical safety priority. Compliance with these standards facilitates early identification of patients at risk and timely interventions. Utilization of validated assessment instruments such as the Braden Scale assists clinicians in evaluating skin integrity and risk levels. Prevention practices include maintaining clean, dry skin, reducing friction and shear, and following scheduled patient repositioning. Such protocols enhance tissue tolerance, decrease injury incidence, and align with best nursing practices for quality care delivery.

Assess (A)

A3: Impact

What is the impact of pressure injuries on healthcare?

Pressure injuries impose substantial financial and operational challenges on healthcare facilities. Costs escalate due to the need for specialized wound dressings, advanced support surfaces, extended nursing care hours, and antibiotic therapies. Beyond financial repercussions, pressure injuries can lower patient satisfaction and overall quality metrics. The added workload also increases nurse fatigue, stress, and job dissatisfaction, thereby affecting staff retention and overall organizational performance.

A3a: Value

What are the benefits of preventing pressure injuries?

Effective pressure injury prevention yields tangible advantages for both patients and healthcare providers. Patients benefit from quicker recovery, less pain, and increased comfort. Healthcare teams experience reduced documentation burdens, greater clinical time availability, and enhanced workflow efficiency. Furthermore, prevention exemplifies patient-centered care, reinforcing ethical and professional nursing responsibilities in clinical practice.

Evidence-Based Practice Change

A4a: High-Reliability Organization

How does implementing turning protocols relate to high-reliability organizations?

Adopting a structured pressure injury prevention protocol aligns with the principles of high-reliability organizations (HROs), which prioritize consistency, accountability, and proactive risk management to reduce patient harm (Khan & Jonusas, 2019). Standardizing repositioning intervals and employing validated assessment tools across clinical units ensure equitable, evidence-based care delivery. Research supports repositioning immobile patients every two hours as an effective strategy to significantly lower pressure injury rates. Following recommendations from AHRQ and the Joint Commission fosters a culture of safety and organizational resilience.

A4b: Barriers

What barriers impede the implementation of turning protocols?

Two major obstacles include:

Barrier

Description

Scheduling Conflicts

High patient-to-nurse ratios and unpredictable unit demands disrupt repositioning schedules.

Patient Non-Compliance

Patients may refuse repositioning due to discomfort, fatigue, or lack of understanding.

A4c: Interventions

What interventions can overcome these barriers?

Addressing barriers requires targeted solutions such as:

  • Creating dedicated “turn teams” responsible exclusively for repositioning to ensure consistency.
  • Involving patients in decisions about their repositioning schedule to foster cooperation and autonomy.
  • Providing education using visual aids and bedside communication tools to increase awareness and compliance.

A4d: Shared Decision-Making

Why is shared decision-making important for successful protocol implementation?

Collaborative decision-making involving nurses, physicians, and wound care specialists is crucial. Establishing shared goals around skin integrity promotes mutual accountability and clear communication. A team-based nursing model, rather than a task-oriented approach, fosters shared responsibility, reducing role confusion. This teamwork enhances patient outcomes through consistent, coordinated interventions.

A4e: Outcome Measures

How should the effectiveness of turning protocols be measured?

Effectiveness can be evaluated through:

  • Monitoring the incidence of new pressure injuries before and after protocol implementation.
  • Using audit tools and electronic health record (EHR) documentation to track compliance with repositioning schedules.
  • Collecting qualitative feedback from nursing staff on challenges and workflow issues to support continuous improvement.

A4f: Care Delivery Model and Impact

How does a team-based care delivery model improve pressure injury prevention?

Shifting from a task-oriented to a team-based care delivery model provides a sustainable approach:

Role

Responsibilities

Nurse Managers

Oversee compliance and ensure accurate documentation.

Charge Nurses

Coordinate schedules and monitor workflow efficiency.

Nursing Staff

Perform repositioning and provide feedback for improvements.

This model enhances interprofessional collaboration, promotes accountability, and improves communication, resulting in superior patient outcomes, higher staff engagement, and better hospital performance metrics.

Summary Table: Barriers and Interventions for Turning Schedule Implementation

Barrier

Intervention

Scheduling conflicts

Assign and train dedicated staff responsible for patient repositioning.

Patient refusal to comply

Engage patients in care planning and provide education to encourage cooperation.

References

Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality. (2017). Pressure injury prevention in hospitals training program. https://www.ahrq.gov/patient-safety/settings/hospital/resource/pressureinjury/index.html

Khan, M., & Jonusas, E. (2019). Turn teams: How do you prevent pressure injuries? MEDSURG Nursing, 28(4), 257–261.

D221 Final Paper: Practice Improvement Plan for Pressure Injury Prevention

Tervo-Heikkinen, T., Heikkilä, A., Koivunen, M., Kortteisto, T., Peltokoski, J., Salmela, S., Sankelo, M., Ylitörmänen, T., & Junttila, K. (2023). A cross-sectional national study of nursing interventions in preventing pressure injuries in acute inpatient care. BMC Nursing, 22(1), 1–12. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12912-023-01369-8

Â