Name
Chamberlain University
NR-715: Scientific Underpinnings
Prof. Name
Date
Translation science theories and models are essential in advancing evidence-based practice within nursing and healthcare. These frameworks act as bridges between research findings and clinical application by providing structured pathways for adopting, testing, and sustaining innovations. Without such models, evidence-based practices often remain in academic literature rather than being effectively applied in healthcare settings. By examining these frameworks, nurses and healthcare professionals can identify strategies to overcome barriers, improve workflows, and enhance patient outcomes.
The central aim of this discussion is to strengthen nursing professionals’ ability to evaluate and apply translation science theories and models in resolving real-world practice problems. Through this process, practitioners gain skills in critically appraising evidence, tailoring it to their unique clinical environment, and promoting continuous quality improvement in healthcare delivery. Engaging in this practice also fosters leadership skills and cultivates resilience in managing complex healthcare systems.
Reflecting on an existing practice issue provides a meaningful opportunity to apply translation science frameworks. The following questions guide this reflective process:
One pressing practice issue is delayed patient readiness at the time of scheduled medical appointments. Frequently, patients arrive unprepared (e.g., incomplete forms, missing documents, or not fasting for required tests), which results in workflow interruptions, longer waiting times, and reduced satisfaction levels for both patients and providers.
To address this issue, the Rapid Cycle Improvement (RCI) Model can be employed. This model emphasizes the importance of testing small, incremental changes in real-time, evaluating their effectiveness quickly, and making necessary adjustments to ensure sustainable outcomes. Its iterative nature ensures that interventions are refined before scaling them to larger populations (Cowdell et al., 2019).
The Rapid Cycle Improvement Model is built on the principles of the Plan-Do-Study-Act (PDSA) cycle. Its main components are summarized below:
| Component | Description |
|---|---|
| Plan | Define a specific problem, formulate a hypothesis, and design a small test change. |
| Do | Implement the test change on a limited scale to minimize risks. |
| Study | Gather and analyze data to evaluate whether the intervention improved outcomes. |
| Act | Decide whether to adopt, adapt, or abandon the change depending on the results. |
| Repeat Cycle | Continuously apply the PDSA cycle to drive sustained practice improvements. |
This iterative model allows healthcare professionals to evaluate evidence-based strategies in real time. It minimizes disruption while promoting adaptability, ensuring that interventions are practical and feasible for everyday clinical settings.
Several barriers hinder the successful translation of evidence into practice when tackling delayed patient readiness:
Organizational Resistance: Staff often resist new processes, fearing additional workload or unfamiliarity with changes.
Knowledge-Practice Gap: Many nurses experience difficulty in aligning theoretical evidence with their daily practice routines (Greenway et al., 2019).
Limited Resources: Staffing shortages, lack of proper technology, or insufficient training limit the implementation of translation models.
Time Constraints: High patient volumes reduce opportunities for testing and integrating new interventions.
Policy and System Barriers: Institutional policies that do not support innovation can slow down adoption efforts (Leach & Tucker, 2018).
Overcoming these barriers requires proactive leadership support, effective interprofessional collaboration, and continuous education and training programs. Establishing a culture that encourages innovation and shared accountability can also foster greater acceptance of translation science initiatives.
This discussion aligns with the following program competencies (POs = Program Outcomes; PCs = Program Competencies):
Integration of scientific knowledge into routine clinical practice (POs 3, 5).
Application of leadership strategies to drive systemic change and enhance care quality (PO 6).
Use of analytical frameworks to translate evidence into innovative clinical practices (POs 3, 5).
Critical evaluation of healthcare technologies and information systems to support care delivery (POs 6, 7).
Advocacy for equitable care in addressing social determinants of health (POs 2, 9).
Synthesis of research to strengthen preventive care and improve population health outcomes (PO 1).
Leadership in cultivating professional identity, accountability, and resilience (POs 1, 4).
Through this discussion, learners are expected to demonstrate the following outcomes:
Critically appraise global healthcare issues and connect them to Doctor of Nursing Practice (DNP) competencies for improving nursing interventions (PCs 1, 3, 5, 7, 8; POs 1, 3, 9).
Apply ethical principles when integrating translation science theories and quality improvement methods into healthcare practice (PCs 1, 2, 3, 4, 8; POs 3, 4, 5, 6, 7).
American Association of Colleges of Nursing (AACN). (2006). The essentials of doctoral education for advanced nursing practice. https://www.aacnnursing.org/Education-Resources/AACN-Essentials
Bekemeier, B., Delaney, K., Wenzl, S., Roberts, M., & Hersh, D. (2020). The diamond project: A quality improvement model for adopting shared service delivery in the Washington vaccines for children program. Frontiers in Public Health, 8. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpubh.2020.00272
Cowdell, J. C., Smoot, T. B., Murray, L. P., Stancampiano, F. F., & Hedges, M. S. (2019). A rapid cycle improvement approach to increase patient readiness at their scheduled appointment time. Quality Management in Health Care, 28(1), 45–50. https://doi.org/10.1097/QMH.0000000000000194
Franklin, B. (2019, November 4). Avedis Donabedian and the birth of healthcare quality assurance. Healthcare Market Review. https://healthcaremarketreview.com/avedis-donabedian-and-the-birth-of-healthcare-quality-assurance/#_ENREF_11
Greenway, K., Butt, G., & Walthall, H. (2019). Review: What is a theory-practice gap? An exploration of the concept. Nurse Education in Practice, 34, 1–6. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nepr.2018.10.005
Hickman, L., DiGiacomo, M., Phillips, J., Rao, A., Newton, P., Jackson, D., & Ferguson, C. (2018). Improving evidence-based practice in postgraduate nursing programs: A systematic review: Bridging the evidence practice gap (BRIDGE project). Nurse Education Today, 63, 69–75. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nedt.2018.01.015
Leach, M., & Tucker, B. (2018). Current understandings of the research-practice gap in nursing: A mixed-methods study. Collegian, 25(2), 171–179. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.colegn.2017.04.008
White, K., Dudley-Brown, S., & Terhaar, M. (2021). Translation of evidence into nursing and health care (3rd ed.). Springer Publishing Company.
Zaccagnini, M. E., & Pechacek, J. (2021). The Doctor of Nursing Practice essentials: A new model for advanced practice (4th ed.). Jones & Bartlett Publishers.
