NURS FPX 4065 Assessment 3

NURS FPX 4065 Assessment 3

NURS FPX 4065 Assessment 3 Ethical and Policy Factors in Care Coordination

Name

Capella University

NURS-FPX4065 Patient-Centered Care Coordination

Prof. Name

Date

Ethical and Policy Factors in Care Coordination

Hello, I am __________. I am privileged to present today on the ethical and policy considerations influencing mental health care coordination. I currently serve as a care coordinator at Longevity Center, an organization dedicated to supporting individuals with mental health conditions through education, guidance, and access to essential care services.

Agenda

This presentation explores the ethical and policy factors that shape mental health care coordination at Longevity Center. Key points include:

  • The significance of multidisciplinary care.
  • Relevant laws such as the Baker Act and HIPAA.
  • The guidance of the ANA Code of Ethics.
  • Ethical challenges, including access and cultural sensitivity.
  • Strategies to reduce disparities through community collaboration and sustainable care systems.

Significance of Care Coordination in Chronic Disease Management

Care coordination is vital for managing mental health conditions effectively at Longevity Center. It ensures timely and appropriate interventions across various care domains. Adults with mental illnesses often receive services from multiple healthcare professionals and community organizations (Bury et al., 2022).

When care is fragmented or inconsistent, patients may experience worsening symptoms, repeated crises, and increased healthcare costs. In Florida, approximately 2,889,000 adults are affected by mental disorders, and in 2021, 40.9% of adults reported symptoms of depression (National Alliance on Mental Illness [NAMI], n.d.). Effective care coordination improves access to comprehensive mental health support and enhances overall patient outcomes at Longevity Center.

Governmental Policies’ Effect on Care Coordination

The coordination of mental health care at Longevity Center is guided by both state and federal policies. Table 1 summarizes key policies influencing care.

Table 1. Governmental Policies Impacting Mental Health Care Coordination

PolicyPurposeRelevance to Care CoordinationEthical Considerations
Baker Act (Florida Mental Health Act)Provides crisis intervention and psychiatric hospitalization guidelinesEnsures legal protections for patients during acute psychiatric episodesPatient autonomy, right to informed consent
HIPAAProtects health information privacyAllows secure sharing of patient data among providersConfidentiality, beneficence
ACA (Affordable Care Act)Expands access, enhances quality, controls costsSupports integrated mental health careBalancing cost-effectiveness with individualized care
Florida Medicaid Behavioral Health ProgramsProvides coordinated care to low-income populationsExpands services for underserved groupsJustice, equitable access, beneficence

Recent policy reforms, such as integrated behavioral health systems and value-based care models, encourage early intervention and preventive strategies. Community organizations, including NAMI Florida, complement clinical care by providing education, peer support, and navigation services (Pincus & Fleet, 2022).

Ethical Questions or Dilemmas for Care Coordination

National Policy Provision

The ACA enhances access to care and promotes integrated mental health services at Longevity Center. Ethical challenges arise when cost-saving measures conflict with patient-centered, individualized care (Braun et al., 2023). Mental health care requires personalization due to variability in patient needs, yet standardized care pathways may limit autonomy and tailored interventions.

State Provision Policy

Florida’s Medicaid behavioral health programs aim to coordinate mental health services for low-income and underserved populations. Ethical concerns include delays in care, restricted specialist access, and administrative hurdles that compromise care quality (Patel et al., 2025). Provider shortages and complex managed care protocols intensify fragmentation, highlighting disparities between Medicaid recipients and privately insured patients.

Local Provision Policy

Local community mental health programs enhance wellness through education and support networks. Organizations like NAMI Florida provide screenings, counseling, and peer support (NAMI Florida, 2025). Ethical challenges emerge when demand exceeds available resources, creating issues of justice and fairness in resource allocation. Inconsistent funding contributes to fragmented service delivery and eroded public trust.

Impact of the Code of Ethics for Nurses

The ANA Code of Ethics for Nurses provides a framework for ethically sound mental health care at Longevity Center. Key provisions include:

  • Provision 2: Commitment to the patient, emphasizing prioritizing needs, respecting dignity, and advocating for patient-centered care.
  • Provision 8: Collaboration to protect human rights and reduce disparities, highlighting culturally responsive care and collective efforts to reduce inequities (ANA, 2025).

These principles—beneficence, justice, non-maleficence, and autonomy—guide nurses in making decisions that foster trust, fairness, and patient safety (Braun et al., 2023). Upholding these standards improves long-term care planning and treatment adherence.

Social Determinants of Health and Health Equity

Disparities in mental health outcomes at Longevity Center are influenced by Social Determinants of Health (SDOH), including economic stability, health literacy, transportation access, and housing security. Patients often face food insecurity, limited provider availability, lack of insurance, and transportation barriers. These factors compromise justice and equitable access. Nurses are ethically required to address systemic inequities and tailor care to individual social and cultural contexts (ANA, 2025).

Recommendations for Support and Collaboration

Ethical policies encourage nurses to drive change through collaboration, community engagement, and policy advocacy. Community partners such as NAMI Florida and the Mental Health Association of Central Florida (MHACF) provide peer counseling, education, housing support, and affordable care resources (MHACF, 2025). Nurses must advocate for culturally sensitive practices and overcome institutional barriers, fulfilling their ethical responsibility to deliver person-centered care.

Conclusion

Ethical and policy-driven care coordination is crucial for addressing mental health challenges at Longevity Center. Nurses, guided by the ANA Code of Ethics and supported by organizations like NAMI Florida and MHACF, can mitigate systemic barriers and promote equitable mental health services. Integrating culturally sensitive interventions and supporting policy reforms ensures sustainable improvements in patient care.

References

ANA. (2025). Code of ethics for nurses. American Nurses Association. https://codeofethics.ana.org/home

Braun, E., Scholten, M., & Vollmann, J. (2023). Assisted suicide and the discrimination argument: Can people with mental illness fulfill beneficence‐ and autonomy‐based eligibility criteria? Bioethics, 38(1), 61–68. https://doi.org/10.1111/bioe.13243

Bury, D., Hendrick, D., Smith, T., Metcalf, J., & Drake, R. E. (2022). The psychiatric nurse care coordinator on a multi-disciplinary, community mental health treatment team. Community Mental Health Journal, 58(7), 1354–1360. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10597-022-00945-7

NURS FPX 4065 Assessment 3 Ethical and Policy Factors in Care Coordination

Florida Department of Children and Families. (2024). Baker act | Florida DCFhttps://www.myflfamilies.com/crisis-services/baker-act

MHACF. (2025). About us. Mental Health Association of Central Florida. https://mhacf.org/learn-more/

NAMI Florida. (2025). Mission. National Alliance on Mental Illness Florida. https://namiflorida.org/about-nami-florida/mission/

National Alliance on Mental Illness. (n.d.). Mental health in Floridahttps://www.nami.org/wp-content/uploads/2023/07/FloridaStateFactSheet.pdf

Patel, R., Baser, O., Waters, H. C., Huang, D., Morrissey, L., Rodchenko, K., & Samayoa, G. (2025). Open access to antipsychotics in state medicaid programs: Effect on healthcare resource utilization and costs among patients with serious mental illness. Journal of Health Economics and Outcomes Research, 12(1), 222–229. https://doi.org/10.36469/001c.137909

NURS FPX 4065 Assessment 3 Ethical and Policy Factors in Care Coordination

Pincus, H. A., & Fleet, A. (2022). Value-based payment and behavioral health. JAMA Psychiatry, 80(1), 6–8. https://doi.org/10.1001/jamapsychiatry.2022.3538

Subbian, V., Galvin, H. K., Petersen, C., & Solomonides, A. (2021). Ethical, legal, and social issues (ELSI) in mental health informatics. In Health Informatics (pp. 479–503). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-70558-9_18