NURS FPX 8014 Assessment 3 Leading Global Health Strategic Planning and Policy Development notes

NURS FPX 8014 Assessment 3 Leading Global Health Strategic Planning and Policy Development notes

Name

Capella University

NURS FPX 8014 Global Population Health

Prof. Name

Date

Global Health Strategic Planning and Policy Development for Diabetes Prevention and Management

Diabetes represents a significant global health challenge, affecting millions of people worldwide. The International Diabetes Federation (IDF) estimates that 463 million adults aged 20 to 79 currently have diabetes, with projections suggesting this number could rise to 578 million by 2030 (Saeedi et al., 2019). This chronic condition is responsible for a considerable number of premature deaths, as well as serious health complications such as vision loss, kidney failure, heart attacks, and strokes. In response to this growing crisis, various stakeholders are engaging in strategic planning and policy development to tackle diabetes on a global scale (Hendricks et al., 2023).

Initiatives by Global Health Organizations

World Health Organization (WHO)

The World Health Organization (WHO) leads the Global Action Plan for the Prevention and Control of Non-communicable Diseases, which includes diabetes as a key focus. This plan aims to achieve a 25% reduction in early deaths from these diseases by 2025 through the implementation of cost-effective policies. During the COVID-19 pandemic, the IDF formed the Diabetes and COVID-19 task force, advocating for equitable access to diabetes care (World Health Organization, 2022).

Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC)

In the United States, the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) has initiated the National Diabetes Prevention Program, which emphasizes lifestyle modifications to prevent type 2 diabetes. Furthermore, the European Diabetes Forum, with support from the European Union (EU), collaborates on developing effective diabetes prevention and management policies (Prevention, 2020).

National Health and Medical Research Council (NHMRC)

Australia’s National Health and Medical Research Council (NHMRC) has developed the National Diabetes Strategy for 2016-2020, which outlines the country’s approach to reducing the impact of diabetes (Krass et al., 2023).

Rationale for Culturally Sensitive Strategies

In addressing the National Association of School Nurses (NASN), the importance of culturally sensitive strategies for diabetes management was underscored. School nurses play a vital role in providing diabetes care for school-aged children, making them a key audience for this discussion (Bergren, 2022).

Research and Preparation

The preparation for this discussion involved extensive research on diabetes, encompassing its causes, prevalence, and global initiatives. Consultations with experts ensured that the proposed strategies were culturally sensitive. By leveraging reputable sources, such as the WHO and the American Diabetes Association, alongside conducting surveys with school nurses, the recommendations were enriched and made more relevant (Largent, 2021).

Proposed Culturally Sensitive Strategies

Sustainable Resources and Policy Development

Diabetes is a critical global health issue that necessitates strategic investment in sustainable resources and policy development. The advocacy for NASN’s involvement in promoting diabetes prevention and management aligns with their mission and contributes to improved health outcomes (Bergren, 2022).

Established Policies in Mauritius and the United States

Call for Investment in Sustainable Resources and Policy Development

Investing in sustainable resources, such as green spaces and access to healthy food, along with advocating for evidence-based policies, is essential. Collaborating with organizations like NASN is critical to promoting a healthier and more sustainable future (Chung et al., 2020).

Reflection on Presentation

The presentation prompted active engagement, with participants recognizing the importance of sustainable resources and policy development. Key takeaways included the necessity for collaboration, long-term planning, and financial commitment to successfully implement diabetes prevention strategies (Galindo et al., 2021).

Future Advocacy Improvements

To enhance future advocacy efforts, incorporating additional examples and case studies that highlight successful use of sustainable resources would be advantageous. The positive reception of the presentation emphasized the potential impact of collaborative approaches in addressing global health challenges (Galindo et al., 2021).

Key Takeaways and Professional Practice Implications

The presentation highlighted diabetes as a pressing global health issue, emphasizing the necessity of evidence-based policies and sustainable resources. Healthcare professionals should remain informed, collaborate effectively, and work towards addressing healthcare disparities to manage diabetes effectively. The role of NASN in advocating for relevant policies is crucial in contributing to a healthier future (Kerr & Glantz, 2020).

Conclusion

Global initiatives to tackle diabetes necessitate strategic planning, culturally sensitive approaches, and investments in sustainable resources. Collaborative advocacy, particularly involving organizations like NASN, is essential for the successful development and implementation of diabetes-related policies. By prioritizing evidence-based strategies and fostering a collective commitment, stakeholders can significantly mitigate the impact of diabetes on individuals and communities worldwide.

References

Bergren, M. D. (2022). Shine a light on school nurses. The Journal of School Nursing, 38(4), 325–325. https://doi.org/10.1177/10598405221099145

Brooks, L. A., Manias, E., & Bloomer, M. J. (2019). Culturally sensitive communication in healthcare: A concept analysis. Collegian, 26(3), 383–391. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.colegn.2018.09.007

Chung, W. K., Erion, K., Florez, J. C., Hattersley, A. T., Hivert, M.-F., Lee, C. G., McCarthy, M. I., Nolan, J. J., Norris, J. M., Pearson, E. R., Philipson, L., McElvaine, A. T., Cefalu, W. T., Rich, S. S., & Franks, P. W. (2020). Precision medicine in diabetes: A consensus report from the American Diabetes Association (ADA) and the European Association for the Study of Diabetes (EASD). Diabetes Care, 43(7), 1617–1635. https://doi.org/10.2337/dci20-0022

Curran, K., Piyasena, P., Congdon, N., Duke, L., Malanda, B., & Peto, T. (2023). Inclusion of diabetic retinopathy screening strategies in national-level diabetes care planning in low- and middle-income countries: A scoping review. Health Research Policy and Systems, 21(1). https://doi.org/10.1186/s12961-022-00940-0

Galindo, R., Parkin, C. G., Aleppo, G., Carlson, A., Kruger, D., Levy, C., Umpierrez, G., & McGill, J. B. (2021). What’s wrong with this picture? A critical review of current CMS coverage criteria for CGM. Diabetes Technology & Therapeutics. https://doi.org/10.1089/dia.2021.0107

NURS FPX 8014 Assessment 3 Leading Global Health Strategic Planning and Policy Development notes

Gong, Q., Zhang, P., Wang, J., Ma, J., An, Y., Chen, Y., Zhang, B., Feng, X., Li, H., Chen, X., Cheng, Y. J., Gregg, E. W., Hu, Y., Bennett, P. H., Li, G., Qian, X., Zhang, L., Hui, Y., He, S., & Wang, X. (2019). Morbidity and mortality after lifestyle intervention for people with impaired glucose tolerance: 30-year results of the Da Qing Diabetes Prevention Outcome Study. The Lancet Diabetes & Endocrinology, 7(6), 452–461. https://doi.org/10.1016/s2213-8587(19)30093-2

Grummon, A. H., Lockwood, B. B., Taubinsky, D., & Allcott, H. (2019). Designing better sugary drink taxes. Science, 365(6457), 989–990. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.aav5199

Gruss, S. M., Nhim, K., Gregg, E., Bell, M., Luman, E., & Albright, A. (2019). Public health approaches to type 2 diabetes prevention: The US National Diabetes Prevention Program and beyond. Current Diabetes Reports, 19(9). https://doi.org/10.1007