How Can Teachers Help Students in Online Classes?
Name
Capella University
NURS-FPX 4060 Practicing in the Community to Improve Population Health
Prof. Name
Date
Valley City Regional Hospital (VCRH), a critical healthcare facility in a mid-sized city, faced a significant disaster on February 12, 2024, at 2:15 AM. A freight train containing hazardous materials derailed near the city center, resulting in multiple explosions and the release of toxic chemicals into the air and water supply. This catastrophic event caused numerous casualties, overwhelmed local emergency services, and led to widespread panic among residents. The derailment’s location near residential areas and major highways exacerbated the situation, disrupting transportation and necessitating the evacuation of the nearby regions. The hospital quickly became inundated with patients experiencing symptoms of chemical exposure, highlighting the urgent need for an effective disaster recovery plan.
Valley City Regional Hospital, with a 200-bed capacity and a Level II Trauma Center, faced critical vulnerabilities during the disaster. The patient surge overwhelmed emergency departments and ICUs, depleting essential medical supplies like PPE, medications, and ventilators. Communication breakdowns among hospital staff, emergency responders, and other healthcare facilities delayed patient care. Staffing issues arose as many staff members needed help to report to work due to transportation problems, personal safety concerns, or health issues. Special populations, including older adults, individuals with disabilities, and non-English speaking residents, faced heightened risks and required tailored care and communication strategies. The disaster at Valley City Regional Hospital underscored the necessity for a comprehensive and flexible disaster recovery plan. Such a plan must address immediate response needs, efficient resource management, staff coordination, and long-term recovery efforts. By enhancing the hospital’s resilience, the plan aims to safeguard the health and well-being of the community, ensuring that VCRH can effectively respond to and recover from future incidents.
The determinants of health in Valley City are a wide range of variables that affect resilience and general well-being in the community, especially in the wake of the train derailment tragedy.
Social determinants of health played a critical role during the train derailment incident in Valley City. The data highlighted that 60% of residents affected by the disaster reported challenges in accessing healthcare services due to socioeconomic factors such as income disparities and educational levels. For example, residents in low-income neighborhoods faced difficulties in obtaining timely medical care and support services, exacerbated by financial constraints and transportation disruptions caused by the disaster (Mendis et al., 2023).
Valley City’s cultural diversity posed challenges in disaster response and recovery efforts. The data highlighted that 30% of non-English-speaking residents encountered communication barriers during the train derailment incident, hindering their access to vital information and emergency services. Effective communication strategies tailored to diverse cultural and linguistic needs were essential but often needed to improve, impacting the coordination and effectiveness of emergency response efforts (Xiang et al., 2021).
Community resilience and social cohesion were evident strengths during the train derailment in Valley City. As per data, residents and community organizations mobilized quickly to provide mutual aid and support to affected individuals and families. However, the data also identified gaps in coordination between emergency responders, healthcare providers, and community groups, underscoring the need for improved collaboration and communication protocols to enhance disaster response effectiveness (Castronuovo et al., 2022).
Economic factors significantly influenced Valley City’s capability to prepare and recover from the train derailment disaster. According to the supplementary data, the hospital’s limited financial resources and budget constraints impacted the availability of medical supplies, equipment, and staff training necessary for effective emergency response. Moreover, economic downturns exacerbated by the disaster strained local resources and funding allocations, highlighting vulnerabilities in disaster preparedness and recovery efforts (Crossley et al., 2021).
The interplay between these determinants and barriers is complex and interconnected. The train derailment exacerbated existing health disparities in Valley City, particularly among vulnerable populations. About 40% of elderly residents experienced health complications due to delayed medical treatment during the disaster, emphasizing the critical need for equitable healthcare access and robust disaster preparedness planning. Effective disaster preparedness requires addressing social, cultural, and economic determinants of health comprehensively (Bardosh et al., 2020). Enhancing community resilience through inclusive planning, targeted outreach to marginalized groups, and investments in disaster response infrastructure are essential for improving Valley City’s readiness and response capabilities in future emergencies. Economic stability and healthcare system resilience are pivotal for long-term recovery from disasters like train derailment (Kalogiannidis et al., 2023). About 70% of businesses in Valley City reported financial losses following the disaster, highlighting the need for strategic investments in economic recovery initiatives and community rebuilding efforts to foster sustainable resilience.
The Valley City Regional Hospital’s disaster recovery plan prioritizes equitable treatment for all, particularly disadvantaged groups, with the goal of lowering health disparities and improving community service access following the train crash. Socioeconomic justice concepts are fundamental to the strategy; they ensure equitable resource distribution to prevent disproportionate impacts and address socioeconomic determinants of health, such as healthcare access and economic stability, to reduce gaps in health outcomes within the community (Raker et al., 2020). It’s also critical to include culturally sensitive methods that honor and cater to the varied requirements of the impacted population. To guarantee that interventions are considerate of and beneficial for all cultural groups concerned, this entails offering language translation services, providing culturally competent mental health assistance, and enlisting the help of community leaders (Xiang et al., 2021).
The development of the disaster recovery plan begins with a comprehensive assessment of community needs, identifying and mobilizing essential resources like medical supplies, shelter, food, and water. Personnel allocation ensures an adequate workforce of healthcare providers, mental health professionals, and volunteers to support recovery efforts effectively. Budget allocation is carefully managed to sustain recovery initiatives and ensure service continuity while understanding the demographic composition of the community and tailoring interventions to address specific needs (Fundi & Daniel, 2023). Accountability in the plan involves roles like an Emergency Response Coordinator aligning implementation with health equity goals, healthcare professionals providing care, and community leaders addressing cultural needs (Flaubert et al., 2021). Volunteers support tasks such as contact tracing and aiding vulnerable groups, bolstering community resilience.
Aligned with Healthy People 2020 goals and 2030 objectives, the plan emphasizes improving healthcare accessibility for all, prioritizing mental health support to address emotional impacts, and tackling social determinants of health like access to nutritious food and housing stability (Pronk et al., 2020). The recovery effort is structured across a timeline with measurable milestones: Immediate response (0-3 months) focuses on emergency medical care, shelter, and initial mental health support. Short-term recovery (3-6 months) expands healthcare and mental health services while beginning infrastructure reconstruction. Long-term recovery (6-12 months) aims at complete infrastructure restoration, sustainable community services, and permanent housing solutions to facilitate comprehensive recovery and improve long-term health outcomes.
Form a cooperative network by involving community leaders, non-profits, and health departments in your area. These collaborations improve the community’s capacity to respond to disasters and guarantee that the recovery strategy is in line with goals related to health equity (Carroll et al., 2021).
Utilize demographic information and details surrounding the train derailment to determine the community’s needs thoroughly. To create a rigorous rehabilitation plan, take into account the community’s physical, cultural, emotional, and economic requirements (Ryan et al., 2020).
Create plans to increase service accessibility and address reported health inequities. This entails expanding outreach to underrepresented populations, providing healthcare providers with cultural competence training, and improving the architecture of the healthcare system to increase accessibility. Provide funding for primary care, mental health services, and health education initiatives (Feinberg et al., 2021).
Implement treatments that support the goals of Healthy People 2020 and 2030. This entails guaranteeing accessibility to primary care, mental health services, and health education initiatives. To make long-lasting gains in community health, address socioeconomic determinants of health, such as stable housing and availability of wholesome food (Kleinman et al., 2021).
For vulnerable populations such as people experiencing homelessness, the disabled, displaced community members, migrant workers, and people with hearing or language impairments, implement thorough contact tracing. Track and assess community development on a regular basis in relation to predetermined benchmarks by utilizing measures such as immunization rates and mental health treatment consumption. Utilize contact tracing to stop the spread of disease, guarantee complete community care, and implement triage categorization to prioritize healthcare for train derailment injuries (Madigan, 2023).
Health and governmental policies such as the National Incident Management System (NIMS) and the National Response Framework (NRF) are critical in shaping practical disaster recovery efforts, particularly in communities like Valley City, which face significant challenges following a disaster. These policies establish structured approaches that guide coordination and resource allocation across multiple levels of government, private sectors, and non-governmental organizations. The NRF serves as a cornerstone for disaster response by promoting a unified command structure that integrates federal, state, local, tribal, and territorial authorities. This framework ensures cohesive decision-making and efficient resource deployment, which is critical for addressing Valley City’s specific healthcare needs post-disaster. By emphasizing community resilience through proactive planning and engagement, NRF encourages local stakeholders to participate actively in recovery efforts.
This involvement not only enhances community preparedness but also facilitates tailored responses that address local vulnerabilities and promote equitable access to healthcare services (Kapucu et al., 2022). In Valley City, the NRF’s impact is evident in its ability to streamline healthcare resource management, ensuring that medical supplies, personnel, and support services are allocated based on identified priorities and community needs. This approach minimizes delays in healthcare delivery and enhances the overall effectiveness of recovery operations, thereby mitigating health disparities exacerbated during disasters. Furthermore, NRF’s emphasis on continuous improvement through training and exercises strengthens Valley City’s healthcare infrastructure, empowering healthcare providers and emergency responders to respond more effectively to future incidents (Kapucu et al., 2022).
The NIMS provides a standardized framework for incident management, further enhancing Valley City’s disaster recovery capabilities. NIMS establishes clear command structures, communication protocols, and resource management procedures that promote interoperability among healthcare providers, emergency responders, and public health agencies. This systematic approach ensures coordinated healthcare service delivery, which is essential for addressing the diverse healthcare needs of individuals, families, and aggregates within the community (Hanlin & Schulz, 2021). NIMS facilitates effective resource management by categorizing resources according to type and capability, ensuring they are deployed where they are most needed during recovery efforts in Valley City. This systematic resource allocation minimizes duplication and maximizes efficiency, which is crucial for maintaining healthcare services amidst post-disaster challenges. Additionally, NIMS’s emphasis on training and exercises ensures that healthcare providers and emergency responders in Valley City are well-prepared to utilize these resources effectively, enhancing overall disaster response and recovery outcomes (Hanlin & Schulz, 2021).
The logical policy implications of NRF and NIMS for Valley City residents are profound, emphasizing equitable access to healthcare during disasters to ensure vulnerable populations receive care without discrimination. Integrating community members into planning and decision-making processes empowers them to contribute to resilience and recovery efforts, fostering ownership and preparedness. NRF and NIMS policies shape Valley City’s disaster recovery strategies by aligning healthcare priorities with community needs and promoting health equity. Adhering to these frameworks enhances coordination, optimizes resource allocation, and fosters a resilient healthcare system capable of effective disaster response and recovery.
Effective disaster recovery at Valley City Regional Hospital requires overcoming communication barriers and enhancing interprofessional collaboration among team members, individuals, families, and community aggregates. Based on the supplementary file, the following evidence-based strategies are proposed:
Trace mapping involves identifying critical communication pathways and potential breakdown points during disasters. Implementing this method alongside SBAR (Situation, Background, Assessment, Recommendation) protocols will standardize communication among healthcare professionals and emergency responders. Research supports that SBAR improves communication clarity and reduces errors during critical situations (Laffoon, 2023). By integrating trace-mapping and SBAR protocols into Valley City Regional Hospital’s disaster recovery plan, communication efficiency will be enhanced, ensuring timely and accurate information exchange. Improved clarity in communication during emergencies can lead to faster decision-making and more effective resource allocation (Laffoon, 2023).
Emergency Management Information Systems (EMIS) facilitate real-time communication, resource allocation, and patient tracking across different locations and have the importance of real-time coordination during disaster response. Studies have demonstrated that EMIS enhances situational awareness and decision-making capabilities during emergencies (Skårsmoen, 2023). By integrating EMIS into Valley City Regional Hospital’s disaster recovery efforts, the team can improve coordination and response times, thereby enhancing overall disaster management effectiveness. Enhanced real-time coordination can reduce response times, optimize resource utilization, and improve patient outcomes (Skårsmoen, 2023).
There is a need for preparedness and coordination among diverse healthcare and community stakeholders. Interprofessional simulation exercises, as recommended in the supplementary file, are crucial for practicing teamwork, communication, and role clarity in simulated disaster scenarios. Research indicates that such exercises improve interprofessional collaboration and preparedness for disaster response (Gandhi et al., 2021). By regularly conducting these exercises, Valley City Regional Hospital’s disaster response team enhances their collaborative skills and readiness to manage complex emergencies effectively. Improved teamwork and role clarity can lead to better coordination during actual disaster events, enhancing overall response effectiveness (Gandhi et al., 2021).
Implementing these strategies tailored to Valley City Regional Hospital’s disaster recovery plan will have significant implications. Standardized communication protocols and EMIS integration will enhance coordination and information flow during emergencies, improving patient outcomes and community resilience. Interprofessional simulation exercises will foster a cohesive team capable of responding effectively to complex disaster scenarios.
Social justice principles and cultural sensitivity are prioritized in the proposed disaster recovery plan for Valley City Regional Hospital, which tackles significant vulnerabilities shown following the train crash incident. By leveraging the MAP-IT framework and trace mapping, the plan aims to reduce health disparities and enhance community resilience through equitable resource distribution and interprofessional collaboration. It integrates evidence-based strategies like SBAR protocols, EMIS utilization, and interprofessional simulation exercises to improve communication and coordination among healthcare providers and emergency responders. This holistic approach ensures comprehensive readiness to mitigate future disasters, fostering a resilient healthcare system that prioritizes the well-being of all community members, especially vulnerable populations.
Bardosh, K. L., de Vries, D. H., Abramowitz, S., Thorlie, A., Cremers, L., Kinsman, J., & Stellmach, D. (2020). Integrating the social sciences in epidemic preparedness and response: A strategic framework to strengthen capacities and improve Global Health security. Globalization and Health, 16(1). https://doi.org/10.1186/s12992-020-00652-6
Carroll, L. D., Wetherill, M. S., Teasdale, T. A., & Salvatore, A. L. (2021). Community health improvement plans: An analysis of approaches used by local health departments. Journal of Public Health Management and Practice, 28(1), E291–E298. https://doi.org/10.1097/phh.0000000000001279
Castronuovo, A. L., Valente, M., Adesi, F. B., Hubloue, I., & Ragazzoni, L. (2022). Primary health care disaster preparedness: A review of the literature and the proposal of a new framework. International Journal of Disaster Risk Reduction, 81, 103278. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijdrr.2022.103278
Crossley, E., Hillier, D., Plichta, M., Rieger, N., & Waygood, S. (2021). Funding disasters: Tracking global humanitarian and development funding for response to natural hazards. https://www.disasterprotection.org/s/WP_8_16June-afrt.pdf
Feinberg, I. Z., Smith, A. O., Connor, M. H. O., Ogrodnick, M. M., Rothenberg, R., & Eriksen, M. P. (2021). Strengthening culturally competent health communication. Health Security, 19(1). https://doi.org/10.1089/hs.2021.0048
Flaubert, J. L., Menestrel, S. L., Williams, D. R., & Wakefield, M. K. (2021). Nurses in disaster preparedness and public health emergency response. In www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov. National Academies Press (US). https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK573904/
Fundi, K.-P., & Daniel, A. (2023). Community-led resource mobilization and early warning systems process assessment: Full report. In Google Books. Intl Food Policy Res Inst. https://books.google.com/books?hl=en&lr=&id=GzPCEAAAQBAJ&oi=fnd&pg=PA1&dq=assessment+of+community+needs
Gandhi, S., Yeager, J., & Glaman, R. (2021). Implementation and evaluation of a pandemic simulation exercise among undergraduate public health and nursing students: A mixed-methods study. Nurse Education Today, 98, 104654. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nedt.2020.104654
Hanlin, E. R., & Schulz, K. (2021). Incident command system and national incident management system. Emergency Medical Services, 263–272. https://doi.org/10.1002/9781119756279.ch95
Kalogiannidis, S., Kalfas, D., Chatzitheodoridis, F., & Lekkas, E. (2023). Role of governance in developing disaster resiliency and its impact on economic sustainability. Journal of Risk and Financial Management, 16(3), 151. https://doi.org/10.3390/jrfm16030151
Kapucu, N., Okhai, R., & Hu, Q. (2022). Network governance for coordinated disaster response. Public Administration Quarterly, 46(4), 309–333. https://doi.org/10.37808/paq.46.4.2
Kleinman, D. V., Pronk, N., Gómez, C. A., Gordon, G. L. W., Ochiai, E., Blakey, C., Johnson, A., & Brewer, K. H. (2021). Addressing health equity and social determinants of health through healthy people 2030. Journal of Public Health Management and Practice, 27(6), 249–257. https://doi.org/10.1097/phh.0000000000001297
Laffoon, K. (2023). Process improvement simulations for nursing. Comprehensive Healthcare Simulation, 393–402. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-31090-4_36
Madigan, M. (2023). Disaster response practices. In Management for professionals. Springer Nature. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-42147-1
Mendis, K., Thayaparan, M., Kaluarachchi, Y., & Pathirage, C. (2023). Challenges faced by marginalized communities in a post-disaster context: A systematic review of the literature. Sustainability, 15(14), 10754. https://doi.org/10.3390/su151410754
Pronk, N., Kleinman, D. V., Goekler, S. F., Ochiai, E., Blakey, C., & Brewer, K. H. (2020). Promoting health and well-being in healthy people 2030. Journal of Public Health Management and Practice, Publish Ahead of Print(1). https://doi.org/10.1097/phh.0000000000001254
Raker, E. J., Arcaya, M. C., Lowe, S. R., Zacher, M., Rhodes, J., & Waters, M. C. (2020). Mitigating health disparities after natural disasters: lessons from the RISK project. Health Affairs, 39(12), 2128–2135. https://doi.org/10.1377/hlthaff.2020.01161
Ryan, B., Johnston, K. A., Taylor, M., & McAndrew, R. (2020). Community engagement for disaster preparedness: A systematic literature review. International Journal of Disaster Risk Reduction, 49. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijdrr.2020.101655
Skårsmoen, M. O. B. (2023). Identifying and mitigating barriers to situational awareness in emergency management information systems. Oda.oslomet.no. https://oda.oslomet.no/oda-xmlui/handle/11250/3102923
Xiang, T., Gerber, B. J., & Zhang, F. (2021). Language access in emergency and disaster preparedness: an assessment of local government “whole community” efforts in the United States. International Journal of Disaster Risk Reduction, 55, 102072. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijdrr.2021.102072
Have a question or need support? Connect with our team today. We’re ready to assist you with personalized guidance to help you achieve your academic goals. Reach out via email, phone, or our easy-to-use contact form.
612-217-0144
info@hireonlineclasshelp.com
Get expert assistance to excel in your courses with personalized support. Our creative approach ensures your academic success every step of the way.
Our Services
