Capella 4030 Assessment 1

Capella 4030 Assessment 1

Capella 4030 Assessment 1 Locating Credible Databases and Research

Name

Capella University

NURS-FPX 4030 Making Evidence-Based Decisions

Prof. Name

Date

Locating Credible Databases and Research – Introduction 

Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD) is a respiratory health problem characterized by obstructed airways, resulting in difficulty breathing. The main contributing factor of this disease is the long-term exposure to respiratory irritants, such as smoke. This paper delves into locating credible and relevant evidence on COPD, assisting novice nurses in researching the diagnosis and adequately managing such patients in clinical settings. Furthermore, in the paper, the reader will learn about the collaboration and communication strategies that can be employed between senior and junior nurses. Moreover, the paper discusses the best places within the healthcare environment for research and identifies five credible online sources for COPD research. Lastly, it elaborates on the criteria that can be used to evaluate the credibility and relevance of these resources. 

Communication and Collaboration Strategies

Senior nurses within clinical settings are responsible for assisting newly trained nurses in understanding and researching credible evidence related to unfamiliar diagnoses. For such purposes, they must employ several communication and collaboration strategies to develop their professional competence and establish good professional relationships. 

Education Programs

Research education programs where nurses are trained in conducting literature reviews, accessing relevant databases, and searching and appraising relevant literature have improved knowledge and confidence, clinical practices, and patient outcomes (King et al., 2022). These training programs augment their professional competence by fostering a culture of continuous learning and empowering novice nurses with evidence-based practice. Moreover, these programs led by senior nurses can promote collaboration and build professional relationships within the team. 

Journal Clubs 

Another strategy is to establish COPD-focused journal clubs. These clubs benefit participants by allowing them to gather regularly for critical appraisal and discussions on recent research articles on healthcare issues/diseases. These clubs promote understanding of healthcare topics and evidence-based practices among nurses (Hassan et al., 2023). Through journal clubs, novice nurses learn to evaluate the quality and relevance of research literature, enhancing their professional competence to conduct evidence-based practice. Additionally, senior nurses can participate as facilitators, strengthening professional relationships within the nursing team. 

Mentoring 

Pairing novice nurses with experienced mentors with expertise in COPD care and research is another collaboration strategy. This structured support system provides novice nurses personalized guidance and experiences from senior nurses related to patient care to accelerate their learning curve, research productivity, and professional competence. Moreover, this mentoring system cultivates a sense of fellowship and mutual respect between senior and junior nurses, laying the foundation for long-lasting professional relationships (Gularte-Rinaldo et al., 2023). 

The Best Places to Access Resources within the Workplace

The best places within our hospital to locate credible and relevant evidence related to COPD include computer labs, nursing workstation computers, the nursing education department, and interdisciplinary team meetings. Senior nurses will guide the novice nurse to the computer lab for the hospital’s online library. They may access various medical research databases pertinent to COPD, such as CINAHL, PubMed, Medline, and the Cochrane Library. These databases provide access to many scholarly articles, systematic reviews, and clinical trials, enabling the nurse to gather evidence-based information (Oermann et al., 2021). Next, experienced nurses would encourage juniors to use computers at the nursing station to search for hospital policies, procedures, and guidelines for COPD management.

Accessing these resources directly at the workstation ensures convenience and efficiency, allowing nurses to seamlessly integrate evidence into their clinical practice. The hospital policies and procedures are good resources as they include best practices endorsed by the institution, ensuring consistency of care within the hospital (Foley, 2020). The nursing education department may have physical resources, such as textbooks and journals on COPD management. Moreover, they offer training workshops on evidence-based practices to help novice nurses explore and deepen their understanding of diseases (King et al., 2022). Lastly, novice nurses can be encouraged and taken to interdisciplinary team meetings to access expertise and knowledge from various healthcare professionals involved in COPD management. 

The Five Credible Sources and their Justification

The five credible sources of information related to COPD are listed according to the ranking related to their usefulness for nurses. 

  • PubMed is the most helpful source for nurses to find evidence on COPD as it extensively covers medical research, providing credible, authoritative, and peer-reviewed information (Ossom Williamson & Minter, 2019). 
  • Second on the list is the American Thoracic Society (ATS) website. This website offers guidelines, position statements, and resources for respiratory diseases, including COPD. As a reputable professional organization in the field of pulmonary medicine, the ATS website’s information is evidence-based and trustworthy, making it a valuable source for nurses (American Thoracic Society, n.d.). 

Capella 4030 Assessment 1

  • Third is the Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality (AHRQ), which produces evidence-based reports, guidelines, and tools to improve healthcare quality and safety in the United States. AHRQ’s focus on synthesizing and disseminating high-quality evidence makes it a beneficial source for US-based nurses to implement evidence-based practices (AHRQ, n.d.). 
  • Another valuable database is the Cochrane Library. It specializes in systematic reviews and evidence synthesis, providing high-quality, up-to-date reviews of interventions for various health conditions, including COPD. It is an excellent source of evidence on the effectiveness of different treatment options and interventions in COPD management.
  • Lastly, the National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute (NHLBI) website offers evidence-based information on COPD, including diagnosis, management, and research updates. The resources on this website help researchers and healthcare professionals design care plans and decision-making related to COPD management (NHLBI, NIH, 2023). 

Criteria to Determine Credibility of Resources

Two tools can be employed to assess resource credibility: the CRAAP test and the DISCERN tool. According to Esparrago-Kalidas (2021), the CRAAP test is a tool used to evaluate the credibility and quality of information sources, such as academic and research articles. It assesses sources based on Currency, Relevance, Authority, Accuracy, and Purpose. Currency examines the timeliness of the information, while relevance assesses its relation to the topic. Additionally, authority evaluates the credibility of the author and publishing journal, and accuracy examines the reliability of the information. Finally, purpose assesses the intentions behind the authors’ work. 

On the other hand, the DISCERN tool is a systematic method of evaluating the quality of online health information, such as patient education materials on various websites. It consists of 16 questions designed to assess multiple aspects of the resource, including reliability, relevance, and bias. DISCERN examines factors such as the scope and aims of the resource, the credibility of the sources cited, the balance of information presented, and the evidence supporting the claims made. By applying the DISCERN tool, individuals can make informed judgments about the credibility and usefulness of health information resources, ensuring they access accurate and reliable information to inform their healthcare decisions (Daraz & Bouseh, 2021).

References

AHRQ. (n.d.). Agency For Healthcare Research and Quality: A profilehttps://www.ahrq.gov/cpi/about/profile/index.html 

American Thoracic Society. (n.d.). Ats websitehttps://www.thoracic.org/about/governance/ats-website/index.php

Daraz, L., & Bouseh, S. (2021). Developing a quality benchmark for determining the credibility of web health information- a protocol of a gold standard approach. Frontiers in Digital Health3, 801204. https://doi.org/10.3389/fdgth.2021.801204

Esparrago-Kalidas, A. J. (2021). The effectiveness of CRAAP test in evaluating credibility of sources. International Journal of TESOL & Education1(2), 1–14. https://i-jte.org/index.php/journal/article/view/25

Capella 4030 Assessment 1

Foley, C. M. (2020). A study of the relationship between hospital policy and nursing practice Thesis, University of Tasmania. https://doi.org/10.25959/100.00035866 

Hassan, N., Singh, K., Kunjavara, J., Mannethodi, K., Alomari, A. M. A., Joy, G. V., Singh, R., & Al Lenjawi, B. (2023). Development and validation of the Nursing Journal Club Perception Scale (NJCPS). Journal of Education and Health Promotion12, 213. https://doi.org/10.4103/jehp.jehp_1043_22 

Gularte-Rinaldo, J., Baumgardner, R., Tilton, T., & Brailoff, V. (2023). Mentorship respect study: A nurse mentorship program’s impact on transition to practice and decision to remain in nursing for newly graduated nurses. Nurse Leader21(2), 262–267. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mnl.2022.07.003 

King, O., West, E., Lee, S., Glenister, K., Quilliam, C., Wong Shee, A., & Beks, H. (2022). Research education and training for nurses and allied health professionals: A systematic scoping review. BMC Medical Education22, 385. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12909-022-03406-7 

NHLBI, NIH. (2023, October 25). Copd research. https://www.nhlbi.nih.gov/research/copd 

Capella 4030 Assessment 1

Oermann, M. H., Wrigley, J., Nicoll, L. H., Ledbetter, L. S., Carter-Templeton, H., & Edie, A. H. (2021). Integrity of databases for literature searches in nursing. Ans. Advances in Nursing Science44(2), 102–110. https://doi.org/10.1097/ANS.0000000000000349

Ossom Williamson, P., & Minter, C. I. J. (2019). Exploring PubMed as a reliable resource for scholarly communications services. Journal of the Medical Library Association : JMLA107(1), 16–29. https://doi.org/10.5195/jmla.2019.433