Name
Capella University
NURS-FPX 8035 Foundations of Evidence-Based Practice in Nursing
Prof. Name
Date
The PICOT framework is essential for addressing critical questions in healthcare research. It stands for Patient/Population, Intervention, Comparison, Outcome, and Time. In this article, we will revisit a specific PICOT question: In hospitalized patients (P), does the implementation of incident reporting (I), compared to the absence of such reporting (C), enhance patient safety (O) within a six-month period (T)? This inquiry builds on the research conducted by Petschnig and Haslinger-Baumann (2017), which explores the effectiveness of incident reporting systems in improving patient safety.
The PICOT components are delineated as follows:
This framework is vital for evaluating the effectiveness of evidence-based practices (EBP) in healthcare settings.
The primary goal of the incident reporting system is to eliminate patient, nurse, and staff injuries within the hospital environment. This includes preventing falls, medication errors, and allergy incidents. In a preliminary assessment, data indicated three incidents of patient falls and two allergy-related reports due to medication errors in 2018. The following year, 2019, recorded four patient falls, one nurse injury, and one staff treatment incident. However, after the implementation of the incident reporting system in 2020, the results were promising: there were no patient falls and only one incident of an allergy due to a medication error. This marked a significant improvement, showcasing a 100% reduction in patient falls and a 50% decrease in allergic reactions compared to 2019. Notably, there were no reports of staff or nurse injuries in 2020, underscoring the intervention’s effectiveness during its initial year (Petschnig & Haslinger-Baumann, 2017).
The intervention is designed to last for three months, emphasizing the importance of continuous evaluation through evidence-based practice (EBP) principles. To effectively measure the intervention’s success, specific metrics must be established for ongoing data collection. Key performance indicators (KPIs) include:
By meticulously planning these metrics, we ensure that all aspects of the intervention are adequately covered. The parameters for data collection will include the incident category, personnel response time, incident duration, individuals recording the incidents, and patient demographics such as age and gender. Regular reporting—whether weekly, monthly, or annually—will facilitate the identification of both short-term and long-term trends, aiding in informed decision-making and necessary corrective actions.
For any new intervention to succeed, it is crucial to garner comprehensive support from management. The cornerstone of sustaining this evidence-based practice (EBP) lies in proactive management engagement with the staff. According to Carlfjord et al. (2018), management should conduct strategy sessions that involve nurses, physicians, and other staff members. Engaging them through regular meetings allows for the incorporation of their insights and experiences into the improvement process, significantly contributing to the intervention’s long-term success.
In summary, the implementation of an incident reporting system in hospitals holds significant promise for enhancing patient safety. The initial findings indicate a substantial reduction in incidents, affirming the importance of continued evaluation and staff involvement in sustaining improvements. By utilizing the PICOT framework, healthcare facilities can effectively assess and refine their practices, ultimately leading to safer environments for patients and staff alike.
Carlfjord, S., Ohrn, A., & Gunnarsson, A. (2018). Experiences from ten years of incident reporting in health care: A qualitative study among department managers and coordinators. BMC Health Services Research, 18(1), 1-9.
Petschnig, W., & Haslinger-Baumann, E. (2017). Critical Incident Reporting System (CIRS): A fundamental component of risk management in health care systems to enhance patient safety. Safety in Health, 3(1), 1-16.
In response to feedback received from previous reports, I have made several adjustments. For instance, APA guidelines recommend spelling out numbers below ten, so I have revised all single-digit numbers accordingly. Additionally, I have ensured that journal titles are capitalized and that “et al.” is correctly used when citing works with three authors. My strengths lie in data gathering and analysis for improvement, while I am actively addressing my weaknesses in planning, as identified through feedback.
By consistently applying these strategies and insights, we can foster a culture of safety and continuous improvement in healthcare settings.
Have a question or need support? Connect with our team today. We’re ready to assist you with personalized guidance to help you achieve your academic goals. Reach out via email, phone, or our easy-to-use contact form.
612-217-0144
info@hireonlineclasshelp.com
Get expert assistance to excel in your courses with personalized support. Our creative approach ensures your academic success every step of the way.
Our Services